That is how many people were deported by Obama and Trump. There is a reason that people called Obama the deporter-in-chief. Here in Harris County, Democratic Sheriff Adrian Garcia led the nation with the number of people deported from Harris County jails. So, if you have family not legally here, don’t expect Democrats to come to your rescue.
In 2019, ICE removed more than 267,000 people — the highest annual total during the Trump administration. That pales in comparison to the high mark that occurred under President Barack Obama, who deported more than 400,000 people in one year. Source
So, how can you help those family members hide? Do you think people who are wanted for committing a crime would call the police to report a crime? Being here illegally is a crime; don’t believe what Democrats tell you in states like Texas that are controlled by MAGA. If they can’t find you, they can’t deport you.
If you report a crime, your name and address are required and don’t believe that that information will remain hidden. I reported a burglary in progress; I was told my information would not be shared. Within three days, an investigator for the persons caught was knocking at my door.
With the new federal law passed by Congress and the Senate, even minor crimes are a reason for deportation.
Do you think you can trust what Democrats or Univision tell you?
Below is Obama telling people to come out of the shadows; how did that work out?
From Slate:
Congressional Democrats are suddenly falling over themselves to endorse the Laken Riley Act, handing Republicans a major victory in their crackdown on immigration before Donald Trump even takes office. GOP lawmakers prioritized the bill this session, pitching it as an urgent revision to “ensure that America’s streets are safe from illegal immigrants who have been convicted of crimes.” It would, in this telling, mandate the detention of undocumented immigrants who commit theft, ostensibly to prevent them from moving on to worse offenses. The act—which originated as a Republican messaging bill to condemn President Joe Biden’s border policies—has already sailed through the House of Representatives with bipartisan approval and advanced to debate in the Senate on Thursday by a 84–9 vote.
This cross-party support might create the impression that this legislation really is what Republicans claim: a common-sense fix to a broken system that will keep undocumented criminals off the streets. But that is a gross mischaracterization. Rather, the Laken Riley Act would impose sweeping changes to the immigration system that raise serious constitutional concerns. It would penalize immigrants who live and work in the U.S. legally, subjecting them to indefinite detention without being convicted or even charged with a crime. And it would transfer a massive amount of power to state attorneys general and district court judges, who could effectively wrest control over immigration enforcement from the executive branch. These judges could, upon a state’s request, ban the issuance of allvisas to residents of entire countries like India.
In short, under the guise of punishing a small number of lawbreaking undocumented immigrants, the act would curtail legal immigration and subject law-abiding immigrants to detention and deportation. It is baffling that so many Democrats would sign on to such a cruel and constitutionally dubious scheme.
The first of these glossed-over details is the fact that the Laken Riley Act would not only target undocumented immigrants “convicted of crimes” of theft, as its sponsors assert. It would also apply to those who are charged but never convicted, as well as those who are arrested but never charged. An individual who is mistakenly arrested because of a police officer’s own error would therefore be ensnared by the law. So would a person who is wrongfully arrested because of racial profiling, prosecutorial malice, or other unconstitutional motives. The same is true of a person who faces charges that are later dropped. Under the act, the government must detain all these individuals without bond, a punishment that is difficult to square with due process.
Take a wait-and-see position before entering the shadows. In a few months, you can figure out what is best for you and your family.